Child Protection Investigation Specialist (CPIS) Practice Exam

Which option is not normally considered a procedural step in examining evidence?

1. Reviewing with a colleague

2. Making a personal decision

3. Validating the information

4. Seeking feedback from others involved

The correct answer is: Making a personal decision

Making a personal decision is typically not regarded as a procedural step in examining evidence. In the context of a child protection investigation, examining evidence is grounded in objective analysis, verification, and collaboration rather than personal judgment. The role of an investigator is to rely on systematic procedures to ensure that the evidence is reliable and valid. Reviewing with a colleague, validating information, and seeking feedback are all integral parts of the evidence examination process. They promote accountability, enhance the integrity of the findings, and ensure that multiple perspectives are considered, which is crucial in sensitive contexts such as child protection. These steps help to mitigate individual biases and ensure that the final conclusions are based on a thorough and collective understanding of the evidence.